Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Yoga for Dummies

You all might remember my attempts to complete the "New York Ballet Workout" as pre recorded on Foxtel IQ. Let me refresh for you - it all went somewhat swimmingly until we got to yoga poses when I went A over T and set my little guy off in the giggles. At that point I gave up the workout in favour of something reassuringly chocolatey. On the basis of this rather poor display of balance and willpower, I went and bought Yoga For Dummies off Ebay. Or at least I thought I did. When I finally put it on tonight (almost two months after it arrived) I discovered that what I have actually ordered is Beyond Yoga for Dummies. That's right folks. I don't have the core game but I own the expansion pack. Don't worry, says my chipper instructor, Sara, you can still do this workout. Awesome. I almost believe her.

To me yoga seems like something borne out of the disappearance of the Spanish Inquisition. Why torture a man with thumb screws when you can encourage him to torture himself in the name of living longer? Without any weights, devices or external influences yoga seems able to make me hurt a lot. I am not disappointed this time. We do some warm up exercises and before we even get to the core activities I'm wishing I could stretch myself on a rack instead. I cave on the first core activity to start writing this blog entry because people need to be warned. Okay so the first activity is;

The Chair; You get to lower your butt as though you're going to sit in a chair and then here's the surprising bit, there is no chair and you're supposed to keep your butt in the air. You can simulate this pose by pouring paint stripper across the tops of your thighs. At this point we're told that this pose is also called the lightening bolt. Oddly, it's not named after the pain you're feeling shooting through your thighs, it's a reference to the shape of your body and to remind you that this pose is energising and builds strength and stamina. Hold that for six breaths, then try a full chair pose for six breaths. Sara then reminds us that we're only getting started. Next up is;

The Warrior; For those still doing yoga, spread your legs and lean over each knee in turn, holding for six big deep breaths. For those of you simulating this - set fire to the paint stripper.

The Triangle: This is the pose that made me fall over last time. It's no different this time. I feel like I've downed half a bottle of vodka and then tried to do this. Simulators, down your bottle of vodka and try to do a cartwheel. Ta-dah!

At this point Charles comes home and finds me half upside down and alternately giggling and squeaking in pain. His eyebrows disappear into his hair and I decide to stop the DVD and wait for a more private moment to learn the last nine poses. Stay tuned blog followers!




Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Out of the mouths of babes

In the before times, when I was still able to sleep in on weekends and I didn't constantly feel like I've been at an all night rave, one of the philosophies relating to child rearing that I used to scoff at was "children should be seen and not heard". Before you have kids of your own you like to stand on your soapbox about this one and talk about freedom of expression, encouraging children to be independent people, etc. Unlike some philosophies, which vanish almost the instant they're born, you'll probably hold onto this one for a little while. Well...at least until about three nano seconds after your child randomly insults a member of the general public for the first time. That's the point when it hits you that you've got no control over what comes out of their mouth but society as a whole blames you for it anyway. When that happens you're less about the freedom of expression and you start thinking that maybe the Victorians were onto something.

The first moment of real parental mortification for me was when my tiny daughter, not even three, marched up to an enormous man sitting outside Coles, complete with beard, tatts all over and interesting dental arrangement, patted him on the knee, narrowed her little eyes and said, "Only dirty, stupid people smoke."
Her entire tiny life flashed before my eyes as his eyebrows went up and then my life flashed before my eyes as his gaze settled on me. In that moment, when all sensation bar cold fear ceased, I had no idea that it was about to get worse.
"Did your Mum tell you that?" Mr Beefcake asked her.
She popped her hands on her hips and gave him a firm nod.
"Yes."
I was so frozen in mortification and fear that I couldn't even defend myself. I had told her no such thing but I knew precisely who had. Fortunately for me, Mr Beefcake was not as nasty as he looked.
"Well your Mum's a very smart lady," he told her.
"I know," she agreed two milliseconds before I snatched her up and ran for the safety of Coles.

"Oh yes," Charles said breezily when I confronted him about it, "I'm working on some early indoctrination to make sure she heads in the right direction."
I suggested that perhaps we could work on indoctrination that wouldn't get me knifed in a car park, thank you so much. I wasn't surprised that Charles found the whole thing enormously amusing. He wasn't within striking distance of Mr Beefcake's enormous knuckled Christmas ham masquerading as a hand.

In that case we could have seen it coming. It wasn't a stretch from what she was being told to her telling someone else the same thing. Unfortunately kids are not restrained by what they've been directly told. Sometimes they seem to wing it with a mish mash of creative imagination peppered with something you've told them in the past. Take, for example, the time Charlotte confronted a man with no arm, shaking her finger at him and telling him, "It's your own fault, you should have listened to your Mama and kept it inside the car."

And my other favourite, when she marched up to an enormously tall man with skin like ebony and said, "How come your skin's all black?" That wouldn't have been so bad except that in the time it took for him to identify me as her Mum and give me a questioning glance, Miss Three gave him some possible options;
"Is it because you don't like having a bath or did someone leave you in the oven for too long?"
I think this one followed on from an explanation of the term "a bun in the oven" relating to babies growing inside their Mum coupled with an explanation of why we keep checking our food while we're cooking. That and my showing her how black the face washer was after I'd scrubbed her with it in the bath.

I'm not always the one present when these little faux pas take place. Charles has been treated to his own stellar parenting moments including a delightful little cultural gaff when Charlotte, freshly clued up by her educational television programs, said hello to their Vietnamese server in Chinese. And kept saying hello in Chinese, louder and louder, because the poor woman didn't understand Chinese.

What got me thinking about all of this was the latest Charlotte-initiated cringe moment. In an effort to cheer her up over there not being any preschool today (school holidays) I took Madam through the McDonalds drive thru for lunch. The young man that served us had a bit of a cold, making his voice a bit raspy and weird, but he was delightful and chatting cheerfully to Charlotte through the window while we waited for the EFTPOS payment to clear.
"Excuse me, can I ask you a question?" she asked, very politely.
"Go ahead," he told her.
"Why do you look like a man and sound like a little girl?"
As my toes curled he looked at me in confusion.
"What did she say?"
"Um...she's just really excited about getting a happy meal," I muttered.
And from the back seat, clear as a bell, came "I SAID..."

Words fail me at times like this but I can't help thinking that maybe there is something to that old adage that children should be seen and not heard.

* I would be especially delighted if you would leave a few examples in the comments telling us about your own "out of the mouths of babes" cringe-worthy moments.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

I honestly don't know how you do it...

I know the debate rages constantly over the working mum versus the stay-at-home mum. We talk about mothers that have no choice to work, families who sacrifice so much financially so mum can stay at home...and no matter which side of the fence you sit it seems that your opinion is the correct one and you think anyone different has a hot spa all their own reserved in hell. Recently there was a study into which environment led to healthier children - ironically full time working mums and stay-at-home mums fared equally poorly...both churning out equally obese little tackers while the part-time Mums had the healthiest children.

Rather typically for me, I really don't know or care which is best. I don't believe there is a cookie cutter solution than can be applied like a security blanket to all children. Follow this method and your children will turn out well adjusted, happy little people and no one will ever turn to a life of crime again. I think it's something every family must decide for themselves. I also think that fathers got off pretty lightly in the whole debate. In some ways its sad that a father is simply expected to keep working - but my sympathy is curtailed when I see the sheer amount of guilt and expectation placed on mothers. Why is it all about the mother's choice? Why don't people ask fathers if they plan to work after the baby's born and then curl their lip and say, "I've always thought that small children need to be at home with their Dad"?

In our case Charles earned the most money and I had the milk-filled breasts so the choice about who would stay home was easy. What was harder was whether I would return to work at all. With Charlotte I was going to be a stay-at-home Mum. Then I gave birth to Miss Outgoing and by the age of six months, if we spent the whole day at home she would almost drive me mad. We needed to go shopping, playing, swimming, visiting other babies - anything to keep her occupied. And it was painfully obvious that apart from the milk-filled breasts I was a bit redundant as far as she was concerned.

She went into daycare at 10 months and it was immediately obvious that I'd made the right decision. She surveyed the room in wonder - clearly wondering where all these playmates had been her whole life and she never even noticed when I left - she was already engaged in the serious business of playing with the other babies. Her first ever tantrum came that weekend when we didn't go to daycare. I had prepared myself for tantrums, tears, separation anxiety...and I was the only one who suffered those afflictions. Apart from her obvious delight with the working mother arrangement, I have to admit that I really loved being back at work. Nice clothes untainted by baby sick, ten minute blocks of time to sit down and not have to get up, leisurely lunches and extra cash to play with. Bliss.

I have never regretted my decision because it was obviously the right one for Charlotte. She's blossomed into a social, bright little girl who makes friends within two minutes of landing in a new social situation and I think daycare has played a large part in that.

James was a whole other kettle of baby. The day he was born he growled when anyone held him but me and his infatuation has continued unabated since. Until very recently he had to be in the bathroom with me so he could see me while I showered and when I left him with anyone but his Dad he would scream uncontrollably until I returned. Rather than play independently he would only be happy when he was in my lap and we were playing together. My only respite was when he slept and when he was in his Jolly Jumper. I didn't think daycare was going to be an option at all and I was ready to give up work all over again.

It's funny how few people appreciate how hard the decision to stay at home can be. They think it's some sort of mythical modern utopia. You stay at home and you play with your children all day. What fun! They don't take into account how you suddenly become responsible for all the housework, all the errands - how people call you up to do their errands (because you have so much free time) and not to mention how insane a total lack of adult conversation can make you.

My husband is a little bit guilty of this. He says he doesn't expect me to do all the housework but it's definitely not a 50/50 arrangement and he always looks to me to point out what housework he should do (as though the threat of being crushed by the mound of clean washing in the laundry isn't a good enough indication). He also rather glibly arranges extra curricular activities outside work like business trips, gaming and drinking with his friends and then doesn't understand why I get so frustrated and upset. I admit, it's hard for him to know how alone you can feel when you're a stay-at-home mother because he's never had to do it. I really look forward to him coming home and just talking to me and giving me a break from 24/7 suicide watch on the big one and constant entertainment for the little one.

I've tried explaining it but he's never had to watch either or both of our children for an extended period so I know he doesn't really understand it. Three or four hours is the longest I've ever managed to get out and about without James since he was born. Even then I've only managed it a handful of times. Charles' solution to my frustration was to tell me that I should get out more and do more things. And happily enough, James has recently become quite mobile and his Mama addiction has eased to the point where I feel comfortable leaving him. So I've been going to burlesque classes.

I think Charles has found those few hours on a Sunday quite challenging. A couple of times I've stayed on to have a drink or two with the girls and the tone of voice down the phone when I've called in has been frustrated and a little despairing. But he maintained that I should still strive to get out more. So, in an effort to bring in some money without having to pop the littlie in daycare, I enrolled in a swim teacher course which ran all day Saturday and all day Sunday with a view to working on weekends to bring in some extra cash. Charles assured me he'd be fine with the kids while I did the course but I still had some reservations. Turns out it was one of the best things I could have done.

When I got home on the Saturday Charles had the stunned, slightly glazed look I see in the mirror at the end of every day. When I asked him how he went his eyes got the wide-eyed stare all war veterans get when recounting their experiences.
"I don't know how you do it," he gasped and I laughed. His eyes got wider.
"No, I mean it," he said, "I honestly don't know how you do it. I haven't managed to do any housework at all."

He was completely flabbergasted at how exhausting it was just to look after the two of them for a whole day. He'd had visions of not just getting the housework done, but of doing a really good job and I could tell that he was a little bit miffed that all he'd managed to do was keep the kids alive. He's always maintained that all I need to do is keep them alive and he'll be happy. But I've always felt that there's an unspoken expectation that because I'm the one at home, I'll do all the chores and errands. For me this means distracting Charlotte while James has his morning nap so I can work like a hummingbird on speed at the housework. This doesn't give me a lot of time to do things and so I work on what I call "the essentials plus one" principal. Which is all the essentials like dishes, clothes, vacuuming, etc first and then either one room gets a proper clean or I do one major cleaning activity like dusting.

The result of the essentials plus one method is that my house is in a constant state of clean but cluttered. It's never pristine but then no one calls DOCS and reports me for neglect and my home hasn't had its own feature on "Hoarders" (yet). I don't know how other mothers keep their homes in an orderly state but I suspect they're a lot nastier with their kids and hubby. Certainly it would take a megaphone and a cattle prod to get mine to clear up after themselves. Charles thinks I care too much about the state of the house. He thinks as long as we're all clean and happy, I'm a success. It's also obvious that as far as he's concerned, I'm the one who cares about it and I'm the one with the time to clean it. I have been unofficially wearing the "domestic princess" tiara ever since Charlotte was born.

It was nice to hear that he found it hard to look after the kids and the house for two full days. Sometimes I feel like a spectacular domestic failure. I get the urge to check into a motel - by myself - just to have a clean place to stay and someone else to pick up after me for a change. I feel like calling a skip and chucking everything out except one set of dishes each and three sets of clothes. I fantasise about making a new rule that if you don't clean your own dishes and clothes, no one else will. And oh how I dream of going back to work. My own money, my own space, adult conversation, and out from the yoke of domestic expectation.

I am thrilled that James finally seems to be becoming a little bit more independent and I would love for him to graduate to daycare - even if it's only part time. But for now I will settle for a little more time to myself and a husband who has a better understanding of why I look so frazzled at the end of the day and why his underpants draw isn't always full.

Sunday, April 4, 2010

See? This is why we can't have nice things!

Until recently we had a fairly respectable queen sized ensemble for a bed. It was great until the little fat guy came along. We could still all fit but if one of the kids sneezed, either Charles or I were unceremoniously dumped out of the bed depending on which way the source of the sneeze was facing. So we decided that with the sale of our old house, it was time to invest in something more family friendly in the bed department – something king sized.

As is the usual practice in our relationship, I did all of the groundwork and research, scurrying through bed stores armed with catalogues and outraged brats in tow and then, when I’d narrowed it down to a couple of choices, I brought Charles in to make the ultimate decision. This is where all of my careful research and frugal negotiations are thrown aside and we buy something I would usually never look at twice.

I’m not disappointed. In this instance Charlotte’s King Single with trundle for sleepovers was quickly upgraded to a purple princess double bunk monstrosity. Then my modest King sized sleigh bed with middle-of-the-range mattress is transformed into an enormous phallic monstrosity in dark timber with its own gold name plate…and matching side tables that rival the size of the sideboard in the dining room. Oh yes, and deluxe mattress. All up our new bedroom suite costs five times what I paid for my first car.

For a visual check out this ace photo, clipped from the catalogue:

This always happens. Charles’ tastes are a lot more extravagant and expensive than mine (just look at how much jewellery the man wears as opposed to me) and he always manages to talk me into these ridiculous purchases with extremely reasonable arguments. Which in this particular case were;

1.) The bed I’ve picked is solid timber, not just pine with a dark surface stain so when it chips or dents, it won’t have cheap pale pine showing through.

2.) If we buy this bed we won’t need to buy another bed for as long as we live. So really we’re saving money in the long run.

3.) I have a bad back so I need a top-of-the-line mattress.

4.) We may as well get the matching side tables – it’s not that much extra compared to the price and it will look really nice. Did I mention we won’t be buying another bed for as long as we live? So we should get a bedroom suite and not just a bed.

Then he divides the cost over ten years, breaks that down into a weekly cost and suddenly I’m not looking at $ but instead a fairly minimal amount that could be spent on either going to lunch or buying an impressive bed. So I give in and we get the very masculine bed. In my head, where occasionally I divide our assets into "His" and "Hers" as a mental exercise for the purposes of maintaining sanity and recognising that divorce, not murder, should be the first choice for concluding our marriage, I assign the whole thing to the “His” column. As soon as we’ve given them a non-refundable deposit I go home and start having misgivings. I’m not even sure the whole lot will fit into our bedroom. Charles remains confident.

When the whole thing comes it is massive, it barely fits, but Charles is right and it does indeed look awesome. In fact, it makes the rest of the house look a bit small and crappy. It also helps if I don’t think of the price or compare that amount of money to all the other things I could have spent or, worse, how much interest I would have saved if all that money had gone on the mortgage instead.

When she sees it in person for the first time Pippa spends a long time looking at it and when I prompt her with, “I know, it’s all very phallic, isn’t it?” she looks at me appraisingly and says, “It is very ‘this is where me and my whole medieval family of twelve sleep’”. She won’t be drawn further on the subject.

For all of my misgivings the new bed does the job it was bought for and all four of us fit comfortably, even accounting for Charlotte’s personal preference for sleeping sideways while thrashing. Unfortunately all of Charles’ predictions about it lasting a lifetime failed to factor in the kind of abuse it was likely to see at the hands of our family. I personally had thought the first blood would come from Charles' penchant for throwing himself down onto furniture instead of sitting. Instead, it came when we discovered this morning that some of the decorative moulding had been snapped off the foot of the bed.

The instant I point it out Charlotte pops her hands on her hips, narrows her eyes and says, “Well I didn’t do it.”

Our eyes instantly meet – whenever a four-year-old announces that she isn’t responsible for something, especially before anyone has accused her or asked her about it, you can conclude that she is 100% the source of the trouble at hand.

In this case her habit of scrambling over the foot of the bed in the morning and launching herself onto us from her delicate toe-hold on the moulding has taken its toll on our month-old super deluxe sleeping apparatus. There’s no point being cross about it – this is the sort of thing that kids do. It’s why we only own cheap, solid Fantastic Furniture couches and a dining table made from cheap Indonesian hardwood that requires either four men or a small explosive device to shift it. It is the latest in a long line of wanton destruction, the worst of which included an explosion of Picasso-esque activity throughout the house with a permanent marker while I slept one afternoon.

That particular incident, which included the “prettying up” of our white kitchen cabinets, our new fridge, our new flatscreen, my mother’s antique hall stand, every wall and door up the hallway of our BRAND NEW HOUSE, every piece of furniture in James’ room and, indeed, James himself (who was turned into a baby zebra), gave us quite a benchmark by which all future naughties will be assessed. Compared to that the bed is a minor blip on quite an erratic radar and no doubt it will all be fixed with a bit of PVA and some brown shoe polish to hide the seam.

Clearly as parents we're becoming accustomed to the destruction of everything we own, despite our efforts to contain the source of the trouble. This time all she got was a stern, "No more climbing over the end of the bed". It's not even worth yelling about. The point of relating all this is to serve as warning for people who don’t yet have children. It’s no good having nice things if you have littlies. This is the reason older people fill their houses with beautifully polished timber furniture, snow white lace doilies, fine china and elegant crystal everything. Because, for the first time in their lives, they can.